Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yannick Hanfmann vs Sumit Nagal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hanfmann vs Nagal analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Yannick Hanfmann vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hanfmann 0 - 0 Nagal
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hanfmann has won 50.41% of points on their second serve, while Nagal has won 54.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hanfmann, in recent form, has won 47.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nagal has won 54.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.3% and 32.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hanfmann has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nagal has saved 62.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hanfmann has won 38.6% of matches played (W/L 22/ 35), with Nagal winning 63.51% (W/L 47/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hanfmann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 207/ 122), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 223/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hanfmann has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.59% of matches (W/L 36/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hanfmann has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.74 while Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 252.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hanfmann has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nagal has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hanfmann has converted 31.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nagal has converted 45.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
95
Rank
45
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
72
Rank
71
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
58% (343-246)
Career Total W/L
61% (326-208)
39% (14-22)
YTD W/L
66% (27-14)
$1,544,050
Career Prize Money
$527,190
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Yannick Hanfmann vs Sumit Nagal For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hanfmann VS Nagal
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yannick Hanfmann | Sumit Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (14/22) | 66% (27/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (31/55) | 63% (62/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (371/444) | 54% (506/434) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 64% (14/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) | 68% (13/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 138 | 66 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:53 | 1:56:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.44 | 221.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1660/2509) | 71% (2154/3031) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (1082/1660) | 66% (1421/2154) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (428/849) | 55% (478/877) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (70/223) | 46% (136/296) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (894/2500) | 41% (1220/3006) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 45% (5/6) | 50% (4/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (8/11) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 78% (18/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 39% (13/33) | 68% (26/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 54% (7/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 83% (29/24) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 17% (29/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (25/6) | 25% (12/3) |
Yannick Hanfmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Adam Walton
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Adam Walton
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
13
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Henri Squire
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
84%
(
42 of
50)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Andy Murray
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
57)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
80%
(
78 of
98)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
0-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alexander Ritschard
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Luca Van Assche
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ivan Gakhov
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hanfmann Vs Nagal Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hanfmann are available here and Nagal photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yannick Hanfmann
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sumit Nagal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
